Sources
Make it yours
Inspired by this story? Turn the idea into your own AI art in seconds — free to start, no card required.
Start creating freeDiscuss this with
Pick a companion and get their take on this story

Inspired by this story? Turn the idea into your own AI art in seconds — free to start, no card required.
Start creating freePick a companion and get their take on this story
Higgsfield's AI-generated short film Cully Hill Boys is drawing attention not as a showcase of what AI video can do, but as a clear map of where it still falls short — and why the strongest moments trace back to human writers and performers.
Cully Hill Boys follows three hapless English lads fantasizing about fame over pints in a London pub, their daydreams escalating into increasingly elaborate visions of celebrity. The premise came from a Black List script — meaning it had real structural bones before a single AI frame was generated. That lineage matters: according to The Verge, the best parts of the finished film are the ones most anchored in that human source material.

A scene from Higgsfield's AI-generated short film Cully Hill Boys, based on a Black List screenplay.
Image: The Verge / The Verge AI
The split is instructive for anyone using AI video tools right now. Fantasy sequences — the pub lads imagining themselves on red carpets, in music videos, surrounded by adoring crowds — are exactly the kind of material AI generation handles with relative grace. They're stylized by design, so visual inconsistencies read as surreal rather than broken. The moment the film needs to hold on a face for a comedic reaction, or sustain a two-shot conversation with consistent lighting and matching eyelines, the artifice shows.
Higgsfield positions itself as a cinematic AI video platform aimed at independent filmmakers, and Cully Hill Boys is its most ambitious public proof of concept to date. The platform's strength — rapid generation of varied visual environments and stylized set pieces — maps almost perfectly onto what the script demands in its fantasy segments. Quick cuts, exaggerated aesthetics, and scene variety are cheap to produce with current AI video tools; sustained dramatic realism is not.
For creators already experimenting with AI image generation before moving into video, this is a useful calibration. The same principle that makes a single AI image of a fantasy cityscape more convincing than an AI portrait of a specific person applies in motion: abstraction and spectacle hold up; specificity and continuity break down. If you're building a short with AI image generation as a storyboarding or style-reference step before generating video, leaning into that divide — planning your AI-generated sequences around visual variety rather than character close-ups — is the practical lesson Cully Hill Boys demonstrates in real time.
The fact that the script came from the Black List isn't a footnote — it's the controlling variable. Most AI video experiments fail at the story level before they fail at the visual level. Cully Hill Boys doesn't, and that's entirely because a human writer solved the structural problem first. The AI tools then had something worth illustrating.
That's a workflow argument as much as an aesthetic one. Creators who treat AI video generation as a production tool layered on top of solid human creative decisions — rather than a replacement for them — are going to get further faster. The film is an accidental proof of that thesis, and it's more persuasive for being unintentional.
Higgsfield hasn't announced a wide release date for Cully Hill Boys, but the project is already circulating in AI filmmaking communities as a benchmark for what the current generation of tools can and can't sustain across a complete short-form narrative.